Memory, Imagery, and Self-Knowledge

Avant, Vol. X, No. 2/2019, doi: 10.26913/avant.2019.02.03
published under license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Dustin Stokes
Department of Philosophy
University of Utah
dustin.stokes @ utah.edu

Received 10 July 2018; accepted 20 November 2019; published 11 December 2019.         Download full text

Abstract: One distinct interest in self-knowledge is an interest in whether one can know about one’s own mental states and processes, how much, and by what methods. One broad distinction is between accounts that centrally claim that we look inward for self-knowledge (introspective methods) and those that claim that we look outward for self-knowledge (transparency methods). It is here argued that neither method is sufficient, and that we see this as soon as we move beyond questions about knowledge of one’s beliefs, focusing instead on how one distinguishes, for oneself, one’s veridical visual memories from mere (non-veridical) visual images. Given the robust psychological and phenomenal similarities between episodic memories and mere imagery, the following is a genuine question that one might pose to oneself: “Do I actually remember that happening, or am I just imagining it?” After critical analysis of the application of the transparency method (advocated by Byrne [2010], following Evans [1982]) to this latter epistemological question, a brief sketch is offered of a more holistic and inferential method for acquisition of broader self-knowledge (broadly following the interpretive sensory-access account of Carruthers [2011]). In a slogan, knowing more of the mind requires using more of the mind.

Keywords:  memory; imagery; self-knowledge; perception; mind


References

Armstrong, D. (1968/1993). A Materialist Theory of the Mind. London: Routledge.
Byrne, A. (2010). Recollection, Perception, Imagination. Philosophical Studies, 148(1), 15-26.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9508-1
Byrne, A. (2011). Self-knowledge and transparency. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 85(10), 201-21.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00203.x
Campbell, J. (2002). Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243816.001.0001
Carruthers, P. (2011). The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596195.001.0001
Cassam, Q. (2007). Ways of Knowing. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107, 339-58.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00225.x
Dretske, F. (2003). Experience as Representation. Philosophical Issues, 13(1), 67-82.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1533-6077.00005
Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gertler, B. (2012). Renewed Acquaintance. In D. Smithies and D. Stoljar (Eds), Introspection and Consciousness (pp. 89-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.003.0004
Gertler, B. (2015). Self-Knowledge. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition). E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/self-knowledge/>.
Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195138929.001.0001
Harman, G. (1990). The Intrinsic Quality of Experience. Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 31-52.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2214186
Hinton, J. M. (1973). Experiences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Holland, R. F. (1954). The empiricist theory of memory. Mind, 63(252), 464-486.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXIII.252.464
Hume, D. (1739-1740/1978) A Treatise of Human Nature, L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.); revised by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00046221
Martin, M.G.F. (2004). The Limits of Self-Awareness. Philosophical Studies, 120(1-3), 37-89.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033751.66949.97
Nanay, B. (2015). Perceptual content and the content of mental imagery. Philosophical Studies, 172(7), 1723-1736.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0392-y
Peacocke, C. (1999). Being Known. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238606.001.0001
Siewert, C. (2012). On the Phenomenology of Introspection. In D. Smithies and D. Stoljar (Eds). Introspection and Consciousness (pp. 129-168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.003.0005
Snowdon, P. (1990). The Objects of Perceptual Experience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LXIV, 121-150.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/64.1.121
Stokes, D. (2018). Mental Imagery and Fiction. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49(6), 731-754.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1442965
Stokes, D. and Biggs, S. (2015). The dominance of the visual. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, and S. Biggs (Eds). Perception and its Modalities (pp. 350-378). New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199832798.003.0015
Russell, B. (1921/1995). The analysis of mind. London: Routledge.
Tye, M. (1990). Ten Problems of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Comments are closed.