Avant, Vol. XI, No. 2, doi: 10.26913/avant.2020.02.06
published under license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Matthew E. Gladden
Anglia Ruskin University
matthew.e.gladden @ gmail.com
Received 28 February 2019; accepted 20 September 2019; published Online First 31 January 2020
Abstract: In this text it is argued that immersion in virtual reality (VR) with the aid of contemporary VR equipment may offer access to novel types of virtual worlds that differ qualitatively from the “real” world and from other types of fictional worlds. The text begins by (a) distinguishing between VR systems, virtual environments, and virtual worlds; (b) showing how the virtual worlds facilitated by VR systems resemble and differ from the “virtual worlds” created in one’s mind when, for example, reading a novel or watching a film; and (c) identifying necessary and optional elements of a VR-facilitated virtual world. Employing a phenomenological approach that draws on the thought of Ingarden and Norberg-Schulz, it is shown that a visitor to a VR-facilitated virtual world can (and frequently does) shift his or her conscious attention along three different “axes”. First, one’s attention can move “horizontally” between the media that disclose the virtual world through different senses. Second, one’s attention can shift “vertically” between the virtual world’s different ontological strata, including its layers of myriad atomic stimuli; distinguishable elements that possess spatiotemporal extension; assemblages of elements that have a context and relations but lack individual meaning; glimpses that build up a lattice of meaning and contribute to one’s knowledge of the world; and the virtual world envisioned as a coherent mentally concretized whole. Third, one’s attention can shift “interspatially” between the many different overlapping constituent spaces of the virtual world, including its perceptual, concrete, natural, built, identifiable, technological, emotional, social, economic, political, cultural, ecological, and possibility spaces. This triaxial phenomenological framework can shed new light on the rich and diverse ways in which VR-facilitated virtual worlds manifest themselves as emergent wholes constituted within human consciousness; also, it suggests approaches by which visitors might more proactively mentally explore and come to inhabit such virtual worlds.
Keywords: virtual reality; virtual worlds; transmediality; space; purely intentional objects; phenomenology; aesthetics; Ingarden; Norberg-Schulz
References
Ajana, B. (2005). Disembodiment and cyberspace: A phenomenological approach. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7, 1-10. | ||||
Asanowicz, A. (2014). The phenomenology and philosophy of simulacra influence on the VR. Architecturae et Artibus, 6(1), 5-8. | ||||
Bailey, J. (2016). The body in cyberspace: Lanier, Merleau-Ponty, and the norms of embodiment. Christian Scholar’s Review, 45(3), 211. | ||||
Bartle, R.A. (2004). Designing Virtual Worlds. Indianapolis: New Riders. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.13 |
||||
Beeson, I. (2001). Information systems in the lifeworld. In AMCIS 2001 Proceedings, 381. | ||||
Bekesi, J. (1999). Dufrenne and the virtual as an aesthetic category in phenomenology. Bulletin de La Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française, 11(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.5195/JFFP.1999.151 |
||||
Butnaru, D. (2015). Phenomenological alternatives of the lifeworld: between multiple realities and virtual realities. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 6(12), 67-80. | ||||
Castells, M. (1997). An introduction to the information age. City, 2(7), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604819708900050 |
||||
Cobián, M.T.R. (2008). Intencionalidad y virtualidad: Merleau-Ponty filósofo de la realidad virtual. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, 1, 223-246. https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.1.2008.5564 |
||||
Coyne, R. (1994). Heidegger and virtual reality: The implications of Heidegger’s thinking for computer representations. Leonardo, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1575952 |
||||
Crick, T. (2011). The game body: Toward a phenomenology of contemporary video gaming. Games and Culture, 6(3), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010364980 |
||||
Cudworth, A.L. (2014). Virtual World Design. Boca Raton: A K Peters/CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17185 |
||||
DeLanda, M. (2011). Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. London: Continuum. | ||||
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. Translated by P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press. | ||||
Deuze, M. (2014). Media life and the mediatization of the lifeworld. In Mediatized Worlds (pp. 207-220). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355.0019 https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355_12 |
||||
Drazdauskas, L. (2006). Virtual reality as a phenomenon of art. Linköping: University of Linköping. | ||||
Erk, G.K., & Uluoğlu, B. (2013). Changing Paradigms in Space Theories: Recapturing 20th Century Architectural History. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 7(1), 6-20. | ||||
Fuentes, P.M. (2016). The inseparability of consciousness from embodiment in the phenomenology of Edith Stein. In Edith Stein: Women, Social-Political Philosophy, Theology, Metaphysics and Public History (pp. 87-92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21124-4_8 |
||||
Geng, Y., & Peng, L. (2016). Three Aesthetic Dimensions of Virtual Reality from the Perspective of Heidegger. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences), 2, 021. | ||||
Giddings, S. (2017). The Phenomenology of Angry Birds: Virtual Gravity and Distributed Proprioception in Videogame Worlds. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.9.3.207_1 |
||||
Gladden, M.E. (2018a). A phenomenological analysis of the posthumanized future workplace. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 48, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.7776 |
||||
Gladden, M.E. (2018b). A phenomenological framework of architectural paradigms for the user-centered design of virtual environments. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(4), article 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2040080 |
||||
Gladden, M.E. (2019). Parinsula: A Generalized Relatively Isolated System Simulator (Version 0.9.4) [Computer software]. Indianapolis: Cognitive Firewall. http://cognitivefirewall.com/parinsula/ | ||||
Gunkel, D. (2007). Thinking Otherwise: Philosophy, Communication, Technology. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. | ||||
Heim, M. (1994). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195092585.001.0001 |
||||
Heinzel, A., & Heinzel, T. (2010). The phenomenology of virtual reality and phantom sensations. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Philosophia, 55(3). | ||||
Hodgson, W.H. (2015). The Night Land. Mineola, NY: Dover. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (1964). Artistic and aesthetic values. The British Journal of Aesthetics 4(3), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/4.3.198 |
||||
Ingarden, R. (1966). Kilka uwag o sztuce filmowej. In Studia z estetyki, vol. 2 (pp. 309-29). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (1970). Über die Verantwortung: Ihre ontischen Fundamente. Stuttgart: Reclam. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (1973). The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. Translated by R.A. Crowley and K.R. Olson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (1974). Über die kausale Struktur der realen Welt: Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt III. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110916201 |
||||
Ingarden, R. (1988). O dziele literackim: Badania z pogranicza ontologii, teorii języka i filozofii literatury. Translated by Maria Turowicz. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (1989a). The architectural work. Translated by R. Meyer with J.T. Goldthwait. In Ontology of the Work of Art: The Musical Work, the Picture, the Architectural Work, the Film (pp. 255-316). Athens: Ohio University Press. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (1989b). The musical work. Translated by R. Meyer with J.T. Goldthwait. In Ontology of the Work of Art: The Musical Work, the Picture, the Architectural Work, the Film (pp. 3-136). Athens: Ohio University Press. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (1989c). The picture. Translated by R. Meyer with J.T. Goldthwait. In Ontology of the Work of Art: The Musical Work, the Picture, the Architectural Work, the Film (pp. 137-254). Athens: Ohio University Press. | ||||
Ingarden, R. (2013). Controversy Over the Existence of the World: Volume I. Translated by A. Szylewicz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03767-8 |
||||
Ivanov, V.V. (2011). Technological space and the ecology of technology. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 81(3), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331611030245 |
||||
Jerald, J. (2016). The VR Book: Human-Centered Design for Virtual Reality. New York: Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool Publishers. | ||||
Keogh, B. (2015). A play of bodies: A phenomenology of videogame experience (Doctoral dissertation). Melbourne: RMIT University. Retrieved from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:161442/Keogh.pdf. | ||||
Klevjer, R. (2012). Enter the Avatar: The Phenomenology of Prosthetic Telepresence in Computer Games. In The Philosophy of Computer Games (pp. 17-38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4249-9_3 |
||||
Kornelsen, J.A. (1991). Virtual reality? Marshall McLuhan and a phenomenological investigation of the construction of virtual worlds (Doctoral dissertation). Burnaby: Simon Fraser University. | ||||
Koskimaa, R., Maj, K.M., & Olkusz, K. (2018). Introduction to Expanding Universes: Exploring Games and Transmedial Ways of World-building. International Journal of Transmedia Literacy, 4. https://doi.org/10.7358/ijtl-2018-000-intr |
||||
Kroon, F. (2015). Creationism and the problem of indiscernible fictional objects. In S. Brock & A. Everett (Eds.), Fictional Objects (pp. 147-173). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.003.0007 |
||||
Lévy, P. (1998). Becoming Virtual: Reality in the Digital Age. Translated by R. Bononno. New York: Plenum. | ||||
Lovat, T., & Semetsky, I. (2009). Practical mysticism and Deleuze’s ontology of the virtual. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 5(2), 236-249. | ||||
Maier, C.S. (2000). Consigning the Twentieth Century to history: Alternative narratives for the modern era. American Historical Review, 105(3), 807-831. https://doi.org/10.2307/2651811 |
||||
Maj, K.M. (2015). Transmedial world-building in fictional narratives. IMAGE, 22, 83-96. | ||||
Maluga, L. (2006). Autonomiczne rysunki architektoniczne. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej. | ||||
Martin, P. (2012). A Phenomenological Account of the Playing-Body in Avatar-Based Action Games. In Philosophy of Computer Games Conference (pp. 29-31). | ||||
McBlane, A.A.J. (2013). Corporeal ontology: Merleau-Ponty, flesh, and posthumanism (Doctoral dissertation). Cardiff: Cardiff University. | ||||
Miller, R. (2006). Futures Studies, Scenarios, and the ‘Possibility-space’ Approach. In Think Scenarios, Rethink Education (pp. 93-105). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264023642-7-en |
||||
Murray, C. (1999). Towards a Phenomenology of the Body in Virtual Reality. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 19, 149-173. | ||||
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli. | ||||
Novak, M. (1991). Liquid architectures in cyberspace. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First Steps (pp. 225-54). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. | ||||
Ostrowicki, M. (2006). Wirtualne realis. Estetyka w epoce elektroniki. Kraków: Universitas. | ||||
Polt, R. (2015). A Heideggerian Critique of Cyberbeing. In Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology (pp. 179-197). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9442-8_12 |
||||
Proust, M. (2003). In Search of Lost Time, Volume 5: The Prisoner and The Fugitive. Translated by Carol Clark and Peter Collier. New York: Penguin. | ||||
Przegalińska, A. (2014). Fenomenologia istot wirtualnych (Doctoral dissertation). Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski. | ||||
Rabanus, C. (2009). Virtual reality. In Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics (pp. 343-349). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2471-8_68 |
||||
Rhodes, Jr., O.E., Chesser, R.K., & Smith, M.H. (Eds.). (1996). Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | ||||
Rousseaux, F. (2010). Phenomenological Issues in Virtual Reality: Technical Gestures Directed like Virtual Pieces of Performing Art. Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Philosophia, 61. | ||||
Ruyer, R. (2016). Neofinalism. Translated by A. Edlebi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816692040.001.0001 |
||||
Ryan, M.-L. (1999). Immersion vs. Interactivity: Virtual Reality and Literary Theory. SubStance, 28(2), 110-137. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.1999.0015 |
||||
Ryan, M.-L. (2001). Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. | ||||
Ryan, M.-L. (2015). Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. | ||||
Schroeder, R. (2003). Beyond Presence and Copresence: A Phenomenological Account of Experiences in Shared Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of Presence 2003: Aalborg University, Denmark, October 6, 2003. | ||||
Scriven, P. (2015). The phenomenology of the ‘Other’ in computer game worlds. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015615294 |
||||
Seifert, J., & Smith, B. (1994). The Truth About Fiction. In W. Galewicz, E. Ströker, & W. Stróżewski (Eds.), Kunst und Ontologie: Für Roman Ingarden zum 100. Geburtstag (pp. 97-118). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V. | ||||
Short, T., & Adams, T. (Eds.). (2017). Procedural Generation in Game Design. New York: A K Peters / CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315156378 |
||||
Sokolowski, R. (2000). An Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | ||||
Stangl, A., Wepman, J., & White, D. (2012). Moodcasting: home as shared emotional space. In CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1303-1308). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212444 |
||||
Thomasson, A.L. (2005). “Ingarden and the Ontology of Cultural Objects.” In A. Chrudzimski (Ed.), Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden (pp. 115-36). Frankfurt: ontos verlag. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.7559 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7327 |
||||
Thomasson, A.L. (2009). Fictional entities. In A Companion to Metaphysics (2nd ed.) (pp. 10-18). Oxford: Blackwell. | ||||
Uemura, G. (2019). Demystifying Roman Ingarden’s purely intentional objects of perception. In N. de Warren & S. Taguchi (Eds.), New Phenomenological Studies in Japan. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11893-8_11 |
||||
Vilariño Picos, M.T. (2011). La Hermenéutica constructiva en/del ciberespacio. De William Gibson a Roman Ingarden. Ámbitos: Revista de Estudios de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 25, 73-83.
“Avant” journal – the task financed under the contract 711/P-DUN/2019 from the funds of the Minister of Science and Higher Education for the dissemination of science.Czasopismo „Avant” – zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy 711/P-DUN/2019 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę. |