Avant, Vol. XII, No. 2, https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2021.02.03
published under license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Paulina Zarębska
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin
paulinazarebska@gmail.com
Received 7 December 2020; accepted 26 November 2021; published Online First 17 December 2021.
Download full text
Abstract: Problem solving as a higher cognitive ability is a theoretical construct operating in cognitive science and cognitive psychology. The founders of cognitive science were united by a shared vision of the mind as a tool similar to a computer – i.e. one serving to solve problems by manipulating non-sensory and abstract symbols inside the system. In interdisciplinary research into dance, the term “choreographic problem solving” (Kirsh, Muntanyola, 2009b; Kirsh, 2011; Clements, Redding, Sell, & May, 2018; Stevens, Malloch, McKechnie, & Steven, 2003; Leach & deLahunta, 2015) has become current in the context of a broad conception of dance practice as the inventive creation of movement in response to choreographic tasks that are the stimulus for creating motor images (James, 1890) and mental images (Franklin, 1996). The purpose of this article is to present an interpretation of the concept of solving choreographic problems in the course of improvised dance. This analysis falls within the paradigms of embodied cognition and situated cognition concepts and theories and works on the basis of initial reports from research on the influence of metaphorical instructions on the solution of choreographic problems in dance improvisation. These initial reports relate to the first conclusions drawn from analyses of research materials taking the form of video recordings, questionnaires and in-depth interviews.
Keywords: choreographic problem solving; situated cognition theory; embodied cognition theory; dance improvisation; metaphor
Bibliography
Anderson, J.R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman. | ||||
Bernard, A., Steinmüller, W., Stricker, U. (2006). Ideokinesis: A Creative Approach to Human Movement and Body Alignment. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books. | ||||
Bläsing, B., Puttke, M., & Schack, T. (2010). The Neurocognition of Dance: Mind, Movement and Motor Skills. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852637 |
||||
Blom, L.A., Chaplin, L.T. (1988). The Moment of Movement. Dance Improvisation. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjrqz |
||||
Butterworth, J. (2004). Teaching choreography in higher education: a process continuum model. Research Dance Education, 5, 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464789042000190870 |
||||
Butterworth, J., Wildschut, L. (2009). Contemporary Choreography: A Critical Reader. London/New York: Routledge. | ||||
Carpenter, W. (2020). The Aha! Moment: The Science Behind Creative Insights. In S.M. Brito (Eds.), Toward Super-Creativity – Improving Creativity in Humans, Machines, and Human – Machine Collaborations. London: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84973 |
||||
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001 |
||||
Clements, L., Redding, E., Sell, N. L., & May, J. (2018). Expertise in Evaluating Choreographic Creativity: An Online Variation of the Consensual Assessment Technique. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01448 |
||||
Franklin, E. N. (1996). Dance imagery for technique and performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. | ||||
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199271941.001.0001 |
||||
Gallagher, S., Cole, J. (1995). Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16(4). | ||||
Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), pp. 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487 |
||||
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040755 |
||||
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000 |
||||
Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental Imagery in the Motor Context. Neuropsychologia, 33(11), 1419-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00073-C |
||||
Lynn, J.M. (2005). Embodied knowing and effective communication in the development of a choreography curriculum. Theses Digitization Project. 2656. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2656 (1.10.2020). | ||||
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 |
||||
Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. ETR&D, 48, 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500 |
||||
Katan, E. (2016). Embodied Philosophy in Dance: Gaga and Ohad Naharin’s Movement Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60186-5 |
||||
Kirsh, D. (2009a). Problem Solving and Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, 264-306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.015 |
||||
Kirsh, D. Muntanyola, D., Lew, A., Jao, J. and Sugihara, M. (2009b). Choreographic methods for creating novel, high quality dance, 188-195. Design and Semantics of Form and Movement. Conference Proceedings. Taipei: Taiwan University | ||||
Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with the Body. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 176-194. | ||||
Kirsh, D. (2011). Creative Cognition in Choreography, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Computational Creativity, 1-6. | ||||
Kitchner, K.S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272885 |
||||
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. | ||||
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Domains, Schemas, Frames, or Spaces?, Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory ( pp. 50-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 |
||||
Laban. R., (1950). The Mastery of Movement on the Stage. London: MacDonald and Evans. | ||||
Leach, J., & deLahunta, S. (2015). Dance ‘Becoming’ Knowledge. Leonardo. | ||||
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07 |
||||
May, J., Calvo-Merino, B., Delahunta, S., McGregor, W., Cusack, R., Owen, A. M., et al. (2011). Points in mental space: an interdisciplinary study of imagery in movement creation. Dance Research 29, 404-432. https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2011.0026 |
||||
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. (Smith, C., Trans.). London: Kegan Paul. | ||||
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. | ||||
Newell, A., Shaw, J.C., Simon, H.A. (1959). Report on a general problem-solving program. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing, 256-264. | ||||
Overby, L. Y. (1990). The use of imagery by dance teachers: Development and implementation of two research instruments. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 61, 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1990.10606437 |
||||
Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J. (2006). How the body shapes the way we think – a new view on intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3585.001.0001 |
||||
Runco, M. A. (2003). Idea evaluation, divergent thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Eds.), Critical Creative Processes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. | ||||
Sawada, M., Mori, S., & Ishii, M. (2002). Effect of metaphorical verbal instruction on modeling of sequential dance skills by young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 1097-1105. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3f.1097 |
||||
Stevens, C. & Malloch, S. & McKechnie, S.& Steven, N. (2003). Choreographic Cognition: The Time-Course and Phenomenology of Creating a Dance. Pragmatics & Cognition, 11, 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.11.2.06ste |
||||
Stevens, C., and McKechnie, S. (2005). Thinking in action: thought made visible in contemporary dance. Cognitive Processing 6(4), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-005-0014-x |
||||
Sweigard, L. (1974). Human movement potential: Its ideokinetic facilitation. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company. | ||||
Todd, M. (1937).The thinking body. A Study of the Balancing Forces of Dynamic Man. Reprint (1972), Dance Horizons, New York. | ||||
Torrents, C., Ric,Á., and Hristovski, R. (2015). Creativity and emergence of specific dance movements using instructional constraints. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts 9(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038706 |
||||
Vaganova A.A. (1965). Basic Principles of Classical Ballet: Russian Ballet Technique, London: Adam & Charles Black. | ||||
Wojnicka, I. (2010/2011). Rudolf Laban i Analiza Ruchu. https://www.academia.edu/36711432/RUDOLF_LABAN_I_ANALIZA_RUCHU (10.10.2020) | ||||
Zarębska, P. (2019). Metaforyczność instrukcji choreografa. Studia Choreologica, vol. XX, 99-118. Poznań: Polskie Forum Choreologiczne. |