Can Arnold Berleant’s Aesthetics of Engagement Be Applied to Conceptual Dance?

Avant, Vol. XII, No. 2, https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2021.02.05
published under license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Lilianna Bieszczad orcid-id
Institute of Philosophy
Jagiellonian University
lilianna.bieszczad@uj.edu.pl

Received 16 November 2020; accepted 6 December 2021; published Online First 28 December 2021.
Download full text


Abstract: The central aim of the article is to reflect on whether—and if so, how—Arnold Berleant’s theory of aesthetic engagement can be applied to works described with the controversial term ‘conceptual dance’, in other words, to works that undermine the determinants of a dance performance. Berleant stresses the open nature of his project of aesthetic experience; however, he does not describe works that seek to destabilize perception in dance performances. With this in mind, the concepts of aesthetics and critical aesthetics are considered as indicating a possible direction for the further development of the ideas outlined in Berleant’s Sense and Sensibility. This extension of Berleant’s thought enables the problem of destabilization of perception to be grasped, and encompasses the issues of criticality and the political, which animate the performances of Xavier Le Roy, Jan Ritsema and Jonathan Burrows.

Keywords: Arnold Berleant; aesthetics of engagement; aesthetic experience; Xavier Re Loy; Jan Ritsema; Jonathan Burrows


Bibliography

Austin, J.L. (2018). How to Do Things with Words (1962). J.O Urmson (ed.). Martino Fine Books.
Berleant, A. (1970). The Aesthetic Field. A Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. 1 ed., Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
Berleant, A. (1991). Art and Engagement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Berleant, A. (1992). The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Berleant, A. (2004). Re-Thinking Aesthetics. Rogue Essays on Aesthetics and Arts. New York: Routledge.
Berleant, A. (2010a). Zajmujący Dewey: Spuścizna Deweyowskiej estetyki, (Engaging Dewey-The Legacy of Dewey’s Aesthetics), Sztuka i Filozofia, (37) 59-70.
Berleant, A. (2010b). Sense and Sensibility. Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World, St. Adrews Studies in Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, Exeter Eng.: Imprint Academic.
Berleant, A. (2016). Aesthetic Engagement in Video Dance (unpublished lecture). Engagement: Symposium of Philosophy and Dance, Texas State University San Marcos, Texas (8-10 September).
Burrows, J. (2018). Politics, In: S. Ellis, H. Blades, CH. Waelde (ed.). A World of Muscle, Bone and Organs. Research and Scholarship in Dance (252-266), Center for Dance Research, Conventry: Conventry University.
Burt, R. (2006). Judson Dance Theatre. Performative Traces, Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969663
Carlson, M. (2004). Performance. A Critical Introduction, Routledge: London.
Cvejič, B. Le Roy, X. Siegmund, G. (2006). The End With Judgment by Way of Clarification, In: M. Hochmuth, K. Kruschkova, G. Schollhammer. (ed.) It Takes Place When it Doesn’t. On Dance and Performance. Frankfurt: Revolved. https://www.mobileacademy-berlin.com/englisch/2006/texte/cvejic03.html (14.11.21)
Cvejič, B. (2015) Choreographing problems: Expressive Concepts in European Contemporary Dance and Performance, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dewey, J., Benthley A.F. (1949). Knowing and the Known, Boston: Beacon Press.
Duda, A. (2007). Estetyka performatywności według Eriki Fischer-Lichte. Teksty drugie, (7) 180-192.
Fabius, J. (2012). The Missing History of (non)conceptual dance, In: M. Heering, R. Naber, B. Nieuwboer, E. Wildschut. (red.) Danswetenschap in Nederland, deel 7. Amsterdam: Vereniging voor Dansonderzoek. https://www.academia.edu/4060526/ (22.11.21)
J. Féral, J. (2011), Théorie et Pratique du théatre. Au-dela des limites, edition L’Entretemps, Montpellier.
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The Transformative Powers of Performance. A New Aesthetics. (I. J. Saskya trans.). London-New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203894989
Franko, M. (2006). Dance and the Political: States of Expection. Dance Research Journal, 38(1-2), 3-18.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767700007300
Goldberg, R. (2011). Performance Art. From Futurism to Present, 3 ed., British Library.
Higgins, D. (1966). Intermedia. Something Else Newsletter, 1 (1).
Keil, M. (ed.), (2018). Choreografia: polityczność (Choreography: Politicality). Warszawa, Poznań, Lublin: Instytut Teatralny im. Raszewskiego.
Lepecki, A. (2004). Concept and Presence. The Contemporary European Dance Scene, In: A. Carter. (red.), Rethinking Dance History. A Reader (p. 170-181). London-New York: Routledge.
Lepecki, A. (2006). Exhausting Dance. Performance and the Politics of Movement. New York and London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012871
Lepecki., A. (2012) (red.). Dance. (Documents of Contemporary Art series), Whitechapel Gallery.
De Marinis, M. (2013). Performans i teatr. Od aktora do performera i z powrotem. p. 8-40 (E. Bal trans.), In: E. Bal, W. Światkowska. (red.). Performans, performatywność, performer. Próby definicji i analizy krytyczne. Krakow, Poland: Wydawnictwo UJ. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/150002/ (11.11.21).
Martin, J. (1933). The Modern Dance. New York: A.S. Barnes.
Rogoff, I. (2006). Smuggling: An Embodied Criticality. Transversal. (8).
Ritsema, J. (2004). A Lecture on Improvisation, lecture presented in Arnheim (6.10.2004), in program Dance Unlimited. https://sarma.be/doc/807 (23.11.21)
Wilkoszewska, K. (2003). Sztuka jako rytm życia. Rekonstrukcja filozofii sztuki Johna Deweya. 2 ed. Kraków: Universitas.
Vujanović, A. (2013). Notes on Politicality of Contemporary Dances, In: G. Siegmund, S. Hölscher (ed.), Dance, Politics and Co-immunity. Thinking Resistances. Current Perspectives on Politics and Communities in the Arts. Zurych-Berlin: Diaphanes AG.
Zeidler-Janiszewska, A. (2007) Perspektywy performatywizmu. Teksty Drugie. (5).

Comments are closed.