Avant, Vol. XII, No. 2, https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2021.03.08
published under license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Michał Kisiel 
Tischner European University
mkisiel@wse.krakow.pl
Received 23 April 2021; accepted 10 November 2021; published Online First 28 December 2021.
Download full text
Abstract: The article focuses on the posthuman authorship in the late short stories of Samuel Beckett in relation to the recent developments in new materialism and material ecology. Beckett’s works insist on the distinctive signature of their author, joining together his trademark minimalist style with his persistence in retelling the same narrative situations over and over again. At the same time, hardly ever does Beckett cease to deprive his narrators of their voices, forcing them to stammer, to struggle with their speech, to be betrayed by it, or to remain completely mute. His hardly readable later short stories seem to abandon any form of the sentient narrator in favour of treating language as self-sufficient matter his abstract spaces consist of, albeit in a manner different from that adopted by the concrete literature. These circumstances interestingly correspond to Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann’s notion of storied matter which emphasises the textual capacities of non-human actors, blurs human and non-human readerships/authorships, and affirms the narratives embedded in the material, understood – after Jane Bennett – as the realm of vibrant entities. In my reading, I analyse how these concepts might allow us to rethink those “materialist works” of Beckett and the possible non-human agencies they are entangled in.
Keywords: new materialism; posthumanism; Samuel Beckett; author; end of the world
Bibliography
| Abbott, H. P. (2012). So, it’s not only unspeakable, it’s unknowable. But is it unnarratable? Beckett and the apophatic tradition. In T. Wiśniewski (Ed.), Back to the Beckett text (pp. 179-189). Gdańsk, Sopot: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. | ||||
| Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. | ||||
| Alaimo, S. (2016). Exposed: Environmental politics and pleasures in posthuman times. Minnea-polis and London: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816621958.001.0001 |
||||
| Attridge, D. (1992). This strange institution called literature. An interview with Jacques Derrida (G. Bennington & R. Bowlby, Trans.). In D. Attridge (Ed.), Acts of literature (pp. 33-75). London, New York: Routledge. | ||||
| Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq |
||||
| Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2): 240-268. https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2010.0206 |
||||
| Barthes, R. (2010). The death of the author. In V. B. Leitch et al (Eds.), The Norton anthology of theory & criticism (2nd ed., pp. 1322-1326). New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company. | ||||
| Beckett, S. (1990a). Embers. In S. Beckett, The complete dramatic works (pp. 251-264). London: Faber and Faber. | ||||
| Beckett, S. (1990b). Krapp’s last tape. In S. Beckett, The complete dramatic works (pp. 213-223). London: Faber and Faber. | ||||
| Beckett, S. (1990c). Not I. In S. Beckett, The complete dramatic works (pp. 373-383). London: Faber and Faber. | ||||
| Beckett, S. (1995a). Lessness. In S. Beckett, The complete short prose, 1929-1989 (S. E. Gontarski, Ed.) (pp. 197-201). New York: Grove Press. | ||||
| Beckett, S. (1995b). Ping. In S. Beckett, The complete short prose, 1929-1989 (S. E. Gontarski, Ed.) (pp. 193-196). New York: Grove Press. | ||||
| Beckett, S. (1995c). The lost ones. In S. Beckett, The complete short prose, 1929-1989 (S. E. Gontarski, Ed.) (pp. 202-223). New York: Grove Press. | ||||
| Beckett, S. (2009). The unnamable. In S. Beckett, Three novels: Molloy, Malone dies, The unnamable (pp. 283-407). New York: Grove Press. | ||||
| Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623 |
||||
| Bersani L. & Dutoit U. (1993). Arts of impoverishment: Beckett, Rothko, Resnais. London: Harvard University Press. | ||||
| Borg, R. (2012). Putting the impossible to work: Beckettian afterlife and the posthuman future of humanity. Journal of Modern Literature, 35(4): 163-180. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.35.4.163 |
||||
| Boulter, J. (2020). Posthuman space in Samuel Beckett’s short prose. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. | ||||
| Boxall, P. (2015). Still stirrings. Beckett’s prose from Text for nothing to Stirrings still. In D. Van Hulle (Ed.), The new Cambridge companion to Samuel Beckett (pp. 33-47). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139871525.006 |
||||
| Brater, E. (2006). From dada to didi: Beckett and the art of his century. Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 19: 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757405-019001014 |
||||
| Cohn, R. (2005). A Beckett canon. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. | ||||
| Coole, D. & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, politics (pp. 1-43). Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996-001 |
||||
| Davies, P. (2006). Strange weather: Beckett from the perspective of ecocritcism. In A. Uhlmann and S. E. Gontarski (Eds.), Beckett after Beckett (pp. 66-78). Gainesville: University of Florida Press. | ||||
| Deleuze, G. (1998). The exhausted (D. W. Smith & M. A. Greco, Trans.). In G. Deleuze, Essays critical and clinical (pp. 152-174). London and New York: Verso. | ||||
| Farrant, M. (2020). Samuel Beckett and the ethics of climate crisis. Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 32: 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757405-03202005 |
||||
| Gandorfer, D. & Ayub, Z. (2021). Introduction: Matterphorical. Theory & Event, 24 (1): 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2021.0001 |
||||
| Garrard, G. (2012). Endgame: Beckett’s “ecological thought.” Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 23: 383-397. Retrieved June 2, 2018, from: https://www.academia.edu/350917/_Endgame_Becketts_Ecological_Thought_. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757405-023001025 |
||||
| Iovino, S. & Oppermann, S. (2012). Material ecocriticism: Materiality, agency, and the models of narrativity. ecozon@, Vol. 3, No. 1: 75-91. https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2012.3.1.452 |
||||
| Kisiel, M. (2017). “White world, not a sound”: Paternal spaces in Samuel Beckett’s Embers. Romanica Silesiana, 12, Le père / The Father: 64-74. | ||||
| Kisiel, M. (2019). Aristeus and Thanatos. Samuel Beckett’s insect poetics. Zoophilologica, 5: 211-226. https://doi.org/10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2019.05.17 |
||||
| Lavery, C. (2018). Ecology in Beckett’s theatre garden: or how to cultivate the oikos. Contemporary Theatre Review, 28(1): 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2017.1403912 |
||||
| Lecercle, J.-J. (2010). Badiou and Deleuze read literature. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638000.001.0001 |
||||
| Libera, A. (2013). Godot i jego cień [Godot’s shadow]. Kraków: Znak. | ||||
| Oppermann, S. (2013). Material ecocriticism and the creativity of storied matter. Frame, 26(2): 55-69. | ||||
| Sheldon, R. (2016). Matter and meaning. Rhizomes. Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge, 30. https://doi.org/10.20415/rhiz/030.e03 |
||||
| Saunders, P. (2011). Samuel Beckett’s Trilogy and the ecology of negation. Journal of Beckett Studies, 20(1): 54-77. https://doi.org/10.3366/jobs.2011.0005 |
||||