An Argument for Investigation into Collaborative, Choreomusical Relationships within Contemporary Performance: A Practical and Theoretical Enquiry into the Distinct Contributions of a Collaborative, Co-creative Approach

Jess Rymer


This paper argues that for both creators of a choreomusical work, a collaborative creative process must be worthwhile, enjoyable, or contribute something unique to motivate artists to collaborate at a time where, to some degree, technology negates the necessity to do so. Therefore, the scholar interested in choreomusical relationships should also be interested in collaborative, creative methods. The research considers cross-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary working processes in music and dance in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries to enquire into the ways that choreomusical relationships have developed for composers and choreographers working collaboratively. It asks whether there are factors which should be considered in a collaborative working method between composer and choreographer to achieve a co-creative endeavor which is satisfactory for both parties. Satisfactory, co-creative results are defined by the satisfaction of both collaborators throughout the creative process, regardless of the end result. These questions were addressed both through historical analysis of collaborations within contemporary dance, and exploration of how choreomusical collaboration can be successful or unsuccessful in terms of co-creation and the satisfaction of each party within current artistic practice. Informed practical research and the use of journals coincide with a grounded theory approach: through analysis of both sets of data, factors which help and hinder choreomusical collaboration in terms of co-creative approaches were identified. The results of this analysis are presented in a spectrum model of possible working relationships between composer and choreographer; this paper applies this to case studies identified within the research in terms of cognitive innovation.


choreography; choreomusical; collaboration; music.

Full Text:



Burwell, C. (2003). Composing for the Coen Brothers. In L. Sider, D. Freeman, & J. Sider (Eds.), Soundscape: The school of sound lectures 1998–2001 (pp. 195–208). London, UK: Wallflower Press.

Butterworth, J. (2009). Too many cooks? A framework for dance making and devising. In J. Butterworth & L. Wildschut (Eds.), Contemporary choreography: A critical reader (pp. 177–194). London, UK: Routledge.

Butterworth, J. (2012). Dance studies: The basics. London, UK: Routledge.

Cage, J. (1968). Silence: Lectures and writings. London, UK: Calder and Boyars.

Cope, L. (2016). PhD Information. Retrieved November 8, 2017 from

Fogelsanger, A. (1998, August). Music composition for dance in the twenty-first century: Questions about the dance/music relationship. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference of the International Guild of Musicians in Dance Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.

Glăveanu, V. P.(2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05434-6

Guedes, C. (2003). Controlling musical tempo from dance movement in real-time: A possible approach. International Computer Music Conference, 2003, 453–457. Retrieved from

Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a collation signalling system. Human Nature. 14(1), 21–51. doi:10.1007/s12110-003-1015-z

Hodgins, P. (1992). Relationships between score and choreography in twentieth-century dance music, movement, and metaphor. New York, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.

Hoffert, P. (2007), Music for new media: Composing for videogames, web sites, presentations, and other interactive media. J. Feist (Ed.). Boston, MA: Berklee Press.

Marisi, R. (2014). Music and dance as a whole. Review of Artistic Education, 7–8, 26–33.

McCombe, C, A. (1994). Slave to the dance? The role and function of music in the work of four contemporary Australian choreographers (Doctoral dissertation). University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

McMains J., & Thomas B. (2013). Translating from pitch to plié: Music theory for dance scholars and close movement analysis for music scholars. Dance Chronicle, 36(2), 196–217. doi:10.1080/01472526.2013.792714

Melrose, S. (2009). Expert-intuitive processing and the logics of production: struggles in (the wording of) creative decision-making in dance. In J. Butterworth & L. Wildschut (Eds.), Contemporary choreography: A critical reader (pp. 23–37). London, UK: Routledge.

Oddey, A. (1994). Devising theatre: A practical and theoretical handbook. London, UK: Routledge.

Pakes, A. (2009). Knowing through dance-making: Choreography, practical knowledge and practice-as-research. In J. Butterworth & L. Wildschut (Eds.), Contemporary choreography: A critical reader (pp. 10–22). London, UK: Routledge.

Sicchio, K. (2014). Hacking choreography: Dance and live coding. Computer Music Journal, 38(1), 31–39. doi:10.1162/COMJ_a_00218

Vlachakis, G., Kalaentzis, A., & Akoumianakis, D. (2014). Collaborative music composition as virtual work across boundaries. In 2014 International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU) (pp. 202–207). doi:10.1109/TEMU.2014.6917761

Wilden, S. (2012). From ear to foot: How intuitive choreographers interpret music (Master thesis). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. Retrieved from


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Jess Rymer