Integrating cognitive (neuro)science using mechanisms

Marcin Miłkowski

Abstract


In this paper, an account of theoretical integration in cognitive (neuro)science from the mechanistic perspective is defended. It is argued that mechanistic patterns of integration can be better understood in terms of constraints on representations of mechanisms, not just on the space of possible mechanisms, as previous accounts of integration had it. This way, integration can be analyzed in more detail with the help of constraint- satisfaction account of coherence between scientific represen-tations. In particular, the account has resources to talk of idealizations and research heuristics employed by researchers to combine separate results and theoretical frameworks. The account is subsequently applied to an example of successful integration in the research on hippocampus and memory, and to a failure of integration in the research on mirror neurons as purportedly explanatory of sexual orientation.


Keywords


theoretical integration; mechanistic explanation; LTP; interfield theories; constraint-satisfaction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arbib, M. A. 2005. From Monkey-like Action Recognition to Human Language: An Evolutionary Framework for Neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2): 105-24-67. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000038.

Arbib, M. A. 2012. How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bechtel, W. 1986. The Nature of Scientific Integration. In Integrating Scientific Disciplines, W. Bechtel ed., 3–52. Dordrecht:

Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978- 94-010-9435-1_1.

Bechtel, W., Abrahamsen, A. 2005. Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (2): 421–41. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.010.

Bickle, J. 2003. Philosophy and Neuroscience. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0237-0.

Bliss, T. V. P., Gardner-Medwin, A. R. 1973. Long-Lasting Potentiation of Synaptic Transmission in the Dentate Area of the Unanaestetized Rabbit Following Stimulation of the Perforant Path. The Journal of Physiology 232 (2): 357–74.

Bliss, T. V P, Gardner-Medwin, A. R., Lømo, T. 1973. Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampal Formation. In Macromolecules and Behaviour, edited by G. B. Ansell and P. B. Bradley, 193–203. London: Macmillan.

Boone, W., Piccinini, G. 2015. The Cognitive Neuroscience Revolution. Synthese, June. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0783-4.

Busemeyer, J. R., Diederich, A. 2010. Cognitive Modeling. BOOK. Los Angeles: Sage.

Craver, C. F. 2002. Interlevel Experiments and Multilevel Mechanisms in the Neuroscience of Memory. Philosophy of Science 69 (S3). UChicago Press: 83–97.

Craver, C. F. 2003. The Making of a Memory Mechanism. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (1): 153–95. doi:10.1023/A:1022596107834.

Craver, C. F. 2005. Beyond Reduction: Mechanisms, Multifield Integration and the Unity of Neuroscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (2): 373–95. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.008.

Craver, C. F. 2007. Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Craver, C. F. 2009. Mechanisms and Natural Kinds. Philosophical Psychology 22 (5): 575–94. doi:10.1080/09515080903238930.

Craver, C. F., Darden, L. 2013. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences.

Cummins, R. 1975. Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy 72 (20): 741–65. Danks, D. 2014. Unifying the Mind: Cognitive Representations as Graphical Models. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Darden, L., Maull N. 1977. Interfield Theories. Philosophy of Science 44 (1): 43–64.

Diamond, L. M. 2003. What Does Sexual Orientation Orient? A Biobehavioral Model Distinguishing Romantic Love and Sexual Desire. Psychological Review 110 (1): 173– 92. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.

di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti G. 1992. Understanding Motor Events: A Neurophysiological Study. Experimental Brain Research 91 (1): 176– 80.

Gallese, V. 2003. The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 36 (4): 171–80. doi:10.1159/000072786.

Glennan, S. S. 2002. Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 69 (S3): S342–53. doi:10.1086/341857.

Glymour, C. N. 1994. On the Methods of Cognitive Neuropsychology. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3): 815–35. doi:10.1093/bjps/45.3.815.

Glymour, C. N. 2001. The Mind’s Arrows. Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Green, J. D., Adey W. R. 1956. Electrophysiological Studies of Hippocampal Connections and Excitability. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 8 (2): 245–63. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(56)90117-1.

Hensel, W. M. 2013. On Reduction and Interfield Integration in Neuroscience. In Regarding the Mind, Naturally: Naturalist Approaches to the Sciences of the Mental, edited by Marcin Miłkowski and Konrad Talmont-Kamiński, 167–81. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Hickok, G. 2014. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition. New York: WW Norton.

Hochstein, E. 2015. One Mechanism, Many Models: A Distributed Theory of Mechanistic Explanation. Synthese. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s11229-015- 0844-8.

Illari, M. P., Williamson J. 2011. What Is a Mechanism? Thinking about Mechanisms across the Sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1): 119–35. doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0038-2.

Irvine, E. 2014. Models, Robustness, and Non-Causal Explanation: A Foray into Cognitive Science and Biology. Synthese, July, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1007/s11229-014- 0524-0.

Kilner, J. M., Lemon R.N. 2013. What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons. Current Biology 23 (23): R1057–62. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.051.

Kohler, E., Keysers Ch., Umiltà M. A., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Giacomo R. 2002. Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons. Science (New York, N.Y.) 297 (5582): 846–48. doi:10.1126/science.1070311.

Kwapis, J. L., Helmstetter F. J. 2014. Does PKM(zeta) Maintain Memory? Brain Research Bulletin 105 (June). NIH Public Access: 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.09.005.

Lashley, K. S. 1950. In Search of the Engram. In Physiological Mechanisms in Animal Behavior. (Society’s Symposium IV.)., 454–82. Oxford: Academic Press, Society for Experimental Biology.

Levy, A., Bechtel W. 2013. Abstraction and the Organization of Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 80 (2): 241–61. doi:10.1086/670300.

Lingnau, A., Gesierich B., Caramazza A. 2009. Asymmetric fMRI Adaptation Reveals No Evidence for Mirror Neurons in Humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (24): 9925–30. doi:10.1073/pnas.0902262106.

Machamer, P., Darden L., Craver C. F. 2000. Thinking about Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 1–25.

Malenka, R.C., Bear M. F. 2004. LTP and LTD. Neuron 44 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012.

Miłkowski, M. 2013. Explaining the Computational Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Miłkowski, M. 2016. Explanatory Completeness and Idealization in Large Brain Simulations: A Mechanistic Perspective. Synthese 193 (5): 1457–78. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0731-3.

Miłkowski, Marcin. 2017. Unification Strategies in Cognitive Science. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 48, no. 1: 13–33. doi:10.1515/slgr-2016-0053.

Mouras, H., Stoléru S., Moulier V., Pélégrini-Issac M., Rouxel R., Grandjean B., Glutron, D., Bittoun, J. 2008. Activation of Mirror-Neuron System by Erotic Video Clips Predicts Degree of Induced Erection: An fMRI Study. NeuroImage 42: 1142–50. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.051.

Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure of Science Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.

Nanay, B. 2013. Between Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Newell, A. 1973. You Can’t Play 20 Questions with Nature and Win: Projective Comments on the Papers of This Symposium. In Visual Information Processing, edited by W. G. Chase, 283–308. New York: Academic Press.

Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.

Piccinini, G., Craver C. F. 2011. Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Functional Analyses as Mechanism Sketches. Synthese 183 (3): 283–311. doi:10.1007/s11229-011- 9898-4.

Ponseti, J., Bosinski H. A., Wolff S., Peller M., Jansen O., Mehdorn H. M., Büchel Ch., Siebner H. R. 2006. A Functional Endophenotype for Sexual Orientation in Humans. NeuroImage 33 (3): 825–33. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.002.

Redouté, J., Stoléru S., Grégoire, M. C., Costes, N., Cinotti L., Lavenne F., Le Bars D., Forest M. G., Pujol J.F. 2000. Brain Processing of Visinottiual Sexual Stimuli in Human Males. Human Brain Mapping 11 (3). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 162–77. doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200011)11:3<162::AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-A.

Rizzolatti, G., Craighero L. 2004. The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27 (January): 169–92. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.

Sanes, J. R., Lichtman J. W. 1999. Can Molecules Explain Long-Term Potentiation? Nature Neuroscience 2 (7): 597–604. doi:10.1038/10154.

Spirtes, P., Glymour C. N., Scheines R. 2000. Causation, Prediction, and Search. 2nded. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Thagard, P. 2000. Coherence in Thought and Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Thagard, P. 2007. Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of Science 74: 28–47.

Triantafillou, S., Tsamardinos, I. 2015. Constraint-Based Causal Discovery from Multiple Interventions over Overlapping Variable Sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16 (March): 2147–2205.

Tsokas, P., Hsieh Ch., Yao Y., Lesburguères, E., Wallace E. J. C., Tcherepanov A., Jothianandan D., et al. 2016. Compensation for PKMζ in Long-Term Potentiation and Spatial Long-Term Memory in Mutant Mice. eLife 5 (May). doi:10.7554/eLife.14846.

Van Orden, G., Pennington B. F., Stone G. O. 2001. What Do Double Dissociations Prove? Cognitive Science 25 (June): 111–72.

Weber, E., Lefevere M. 2015. Unification, the Answer to Resemblance Questions. Synthese. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0969-9.

Whitlock, J. R. 2006. Learning Induces Long-Term Potentiation in the Hippocampus. Science 313 (5790): 1093–97. doi:10.1126/science.1128134.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Marcin Miłkowski