The Displaced Dispositif

Guy Edmonds, Shaun Lewin

Abstract


Dispositif” is a term used in film studies since the 1970s to describe the entire system of mechanical and human factors which together bring about the cinema experience. It therefore refers to (amongst other things) the space of the auditorium, the screen, the projection technology and the physiology of the spectator. Many of its qualifying components are masked from the view of participants in the system. The dispositif’s purpose is to set up the conditions for a specific type of cognitive experience, one which mirrors and extends (and in some readings, controls) the experience of its participants.

The Displaced Dispositif is a performance designed for the space of a cinema theatre, but featuring the projection of fragments of early silent cinema on a coeval (1910s) film projector from the auditorium. The film fragments are live-scored by the sound artist, Shaun Lewin, using a combination of closely mic’d sources on the projector itself, luminance data from the projected image and EEG brainwave data recorded from participants during previous projections of the film. Displacing elements in the dispositif in this way, by shifting modalities, situating in parallel, feeding back and layering, draws attention to its hidden existence and creates the potential for a more knowing and informed participation in the cinema experience. It also serves to demonstrate the degree to which dispositifs of modern cinema spectatorship, which have morphed and proliferated since the widespread digitization of film heritage, have radically altered both the technological and experiential qualities of the medium. By integrating EEG data, the performance adds the dimension of electrophysiological experience to the long tradition within experimental cinema of artists calling attention to Cinema’s hidden structures. As well as challenging the dominance of the worldview propagated by the film industry, the performance also signals a means of re-engaging with the creative potential of the system itself, once unshackled from its bonds to the reality effect and freed from the limits imposed by its commercializing instincts.


Keywords


early cinema; EEG; flicker; performance; sonification

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baudry, J.-L.(1970). Effets idéologiques produits par l’appareil de base. Cinéthique, 1970(7–8), 1–8.

Baudry, J.-L. (1975). Le dispositif: Approches métapsychologiques de l’impression de réalité. Communications, 1975(23), 56–72.

Baudry, J.-L. (1986). The apparatus: Metapsychological Approaches to the impression of reality in cinema. In P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, apparatus, ideology: A film theory reader (pp. 299–318). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Edmonds, G. (2016). Electrophysiology of cinema spectatorship. In M. Punt, S. L. Denham, & E. Doove (Eds.), Off the Lip: Transdisciplinary Approaches to Cognitive Innovation: Conference

proceedings (pp. 43–50). Plymouth, UK: Plymouth University. Retrieved from http://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/4271

Enticknap, L. (2005). Moving image technology: From zoetrope to digital. London, UK: Wallflower Press.

Fossati, G. (2009). From grain to pixel: The archival life of film in transition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

Herrmann, C. S. (2001). Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: Resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Experimental Brain Research, 137(3–4), 346–353. doi:10.1007/s002210100682

Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1996). The perception of motion pictures. In M. P. Friedman & E. C. Carterette (Eds.), Cognitive ecology (pp. 205–292). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Kessler, F. (2006). The cinema of attractions as dispositif. In W. Strauven (Ed.), The cinema of attractions reloaded (pp. 57–69). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

Miller, G. A. (1947). An auditory analogue of visual flicker. American Psychologist, 2, 291.

Parente, A., & de Carvalho, V. (2008). Cinema as dispositif: Between cinema and contemporary art. Cinémas, 19(1), 37–55. doi:10.7202/029498ar

Punt, M. (2000). Early cinema and the technological imaginary. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Postdigital Press.

Rodowick, D. N. (2007). The virtual life of film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Youngblood, G. (1970). Expanded cinema. London, UK: Studio Vista.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Edmonds, Shaun Lewin